Crowley v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
This is an action of tort to recover damages for an assault, and for a false and malicious arrest and imprisonment. The defendant operates two connecting lines of street railway on Main and Water Streets in Fitchburg. A passenger paying his fare on one is entitled to a transfer taking him to his place of destination on the other. But if he changes from one line to the other the rules of the company require him either to produce a transfer or in default thereof to pay fare. The plaintiff lived on Water Street and got on to a Main Street car to go to his home, changing cars at a place called…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradshaw v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Dixon v. New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berry v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Norton v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Morrill v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Twiss v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Arnold v. Rhode Island CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.