People v. Schindler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), Acting P. J.
Pursuant to rule 62, California Rules of Court, we transferred this matter from the appellate department of the superior court in order to settle an important question of law. (1) Contrary to the appellate department, we conclude that after convicting a defendant of a traffic infraction the trial court is not required to state its reasons for denying the defendant’s request for traffic school. (Veh. Code, § 42005.) 1 We affirm the judgment of the municipal court.
Facts
Defendant and appellant Caryn Schindler was cited for speeding at 76 miles per hour on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. Kathy P.California Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. RomeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. FugateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.