Frey v. Gingrich
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 198, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from order of C. P. Franklin Co., Dec. T., 1889, No. 163, discharging rule to open judgment in case of J. F. Frey, to use of Wm. R. Keefer, and Corpus Christi Catholic Church of Chambers-burg v. J. E. Gingrich. Rule to open judgment.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 198, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from order of C. P. Franklin Co., Dec. T., 1889, No. 163, discharging rule to open judgment in case of J. F. Frey, to use of Wm. R. Keefer, and Corpus Christi Catholic Church of Chambers-burg v. J. E. Gingrich. Rule to open judgment. Gillan, P. J., filed the following opinion: On November 18, 1889, defendant confessed judgment to Mrs. J. F. Frey to No. 163 of December term, 1889, in the sum of $450. This judgment was given as collateral security for the payment of a promissory note to J. E. Gingrich, R. M. Beck and J. M. McDowell. A scire facias…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal from an order refusing to open a judgment entered upon confession by an attorney and twice revived by scire facias, in each of which instances, judgment was taken on,two returns of nihil. Notwith*421standing the earnest argument of appellant’s counsel, we are of opinion, that the learned judge proceeded on correct principles of law and equity in passing upon the application, and that his conclusions of fact are so well supported by the evidence that we ought not to disturb them. In view of the clear and satisfactory opinion filed by him, no useful purpose would be…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Colquhoun v. General Flooring & Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916