Deichmann v. Deichmann
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Charles Circuit Court. cited Brock v. Hidy, 18 Ohio St. 306.
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge
This is a petition for the specific performance of a contract for the sale by defendant to-Frederick Deichmann, the father and husband of the plaintiffs, during Deichmann’s life, of the undivided half of some seventy acres of land situate in St. Charles county. In regard to some of the allegations of the petition, the testimony is contradictory; but it is undisputed that the legal title was in defendant, and that on the 15th of August, 1864, he and Frederick Deichmann executed a written agreement by which they entered into partnership in regard to the land in controversy, and that Frederick…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crary v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Brock v. HidyOhio Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by33 opinions
- Black River Lumber Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Baltimore Elevator Co. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Westlake & Button v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
- Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.