Smith v. Grant

The second order refused to re-settle the order made June 15th, on the ground that “the same was in conformity to the decision made,” and there is no proof that it was not, so that there is nothing in the second order which can be reviewed, nor can we review the *256first order, for the reasons: First. The part granting an adjournment of the trial until June 21st was made on the defendant’s application. It was, as far as it went, a decision in the defendant’s favor, and as a consequence he cannot complain of it. Second. The part imposing stringent terms and conditions on the defendant, was…