Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Meyer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1981No. 341PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

Robert A. Meyer has appealed from the lower court’s affirmance of his conviction by a magistrate, 1 of the summary offense of public drunkenness. 2 The central issue for our determination is whether, under the facts presented, appellant’s conduct constituted public drunkenness within the statutory definition of the offense. The lower court found that appellant’s conduct constituted public drunkenness and that his arrest for that offense was proper. We reverse.

Appellant’s central contention is that the Commonwealth failed to prove that his conduct fit within the statutory…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. ShillingfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. United States v. CrutchfieldDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WhritenourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. LawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Com. v. Goldman,T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Connell v. Sun Oil Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. FedorekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API