Commonwealth v. Meyer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
Robert A. Meyer has appealed from the lower court’s affirmance of his conviction by a magistrate, 1 of the summary offense of public drunkenness. 2 The central issue for our determination is whether, under the facts presented, appellant’s conduct constituted public drunkenness within the statutory definition of the offense. The lower court found that appellant’s conduct constituted public drunkenness and that his arrest for that offense was proper. We reverse.
Appellant’s central contention is that the Commonwealth failed to prove that his conduct fit within the statutory…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. ShillingfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
- United States v. CrutchfieldDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WhritenourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. LawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Com. v. Goldman,T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Connell v. Sun Oil Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
- Commonwealth v. FedorekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.