Legal Opinion

Williams v. Haile Gold Mining Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 1, 1911No. 7888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Prince, J., Kershaw, May, 1910. Action by Emma E. Williams against the Haile Gold Mining Co. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

The sole point made by this appeal is that the perpetual injunction granted by the Circuit Court exceeds the plaintiffs right of injunction as determined by this Court on the former appeal.

The Circuit Court enjoined) the defendant “from emptying any chlorinated water or any harmful and poisonous discharges from said chlorination mill into the waters of the said Mine Branch and said Tittle Tynch’s Creek, and ‘that the plaintiff have the right to have the waters of the streams flow through her lands unpolluted, so that the cattle in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Haile Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Jones AmermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API