Legal Opinion
O. K. Armstrong v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 18, 1956No. 15381_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
O. K. Armstrong entered a plea of not guilty to an indictment in three counts, each of which charged him, under Section 145(b) of Title 26 U.S.C., with having wilfully attempted to defeat and evade income taxes owed the United States by filing a false return. The first count related to his income tax for 1947, and the following two counts related to his 1948 and 1949 taxes, respectively. He was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict of guilty upon each count. The printed record shows that “on the verdict of guilty the Court assessed a fine of $500.00 on each of the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Benjamin Dranow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Steven Elmer Luschen, United States of America v. Wayne Bernard KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Carmine G. DesapioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Ralph Melvin Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Rudolph J. Nassif v. United States of America, Paul Otto Schmadebeck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.