Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 23, 1954No. 36403Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Vice Chief Justice.

The defendants filed an application to vacate the judgment on the ground that the summons was irregular. Such proceeding must be by motion under 12 O.S.1951 § 1031. On the 21st day of December, 1953, the trial court overruled the motion. On February 20, 1954, the court overruled a motion for new trial. The notice of intention to appeal was not given until after the latter order. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason the order overruling the motion for new trial was unnecessary and did not extend the time to give the notice of appeal. The motion to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. RicheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Long v. McMahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API