Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Suk Ho Chun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although defendant was temporarily residing in Queens County when the action was commenced, the IAS court properly retained venue in Bronx County, where the cause of action arose and all nonparty material liability witnesses reside. Although it is proper to bring suit in a county where one of the parties resides, upon a proper showing a transitory action may also be tried in the county where the cause of action arose when such promotes the convenience of witnesses (McKinney & Son v Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, 84 AD2d 635; compare, Green v Shortts, 145 AD2d 340). Plaintiff having made the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. ShorttsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. James McKinney & Son, Inc. v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bonfeld v. Suburban Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Wickman v. Pyramid Crossgates Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Oquendo v. Nationwide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API