Legal Opinion

Van Gundy ex rel. Boling v. Packard Motor Car Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 6, 1923No. 24,702PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Btjrch, J.:

Van Gundy recovered damages against the motor car company for injuries sustained in the accident referred to in the opinion in Stimpson v. Motor Car Co., ante, p. 363. The company appeals.

Flynn was joined as a defendant. 'The verdict reads as follows:

“We, the jury empaneled and sworn in the above entitled case, do upon our oath find for the plaintiff, E. B. Van Gundy, and« against the defendant, The Packard Motor Car Company, and assess the amount of plaintiff’s recovery at $5,000, and we further find for the defendant, A. H. Flynn.”

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carson v. TurrishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. Fox v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rierson v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Dunbaden v. Castles Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API