Legal Opinion

Foster v. Kragh

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 3, 1940No. 14,543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Otto Bock

This is an action in which plaintiff in error, as conservator of the estate of Kate Kragh, mental incompetent, sought to recover for the estate the balance due on a time certificate of deposit issued to her by defendant in error, Hereford State Bank, in the sum of $1476.67. It appears that the certificate was assigned by Mrs. Kragh to her husband, and by him to Chris Kragh, defendant in error, who in turn delivered it to the bank as security for a loan to him. The conservator, seeking to avoid these assignments, alleged that they were given without' consideration, and that at the time they…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foster v. KraghSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Foster v. KraghSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  3. Foster v. KraghSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  4. Foster v. KraghSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  5. Jenkins v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API