Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 6, 1990No. C89-1587 WDPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DWYER, District Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs, registered voters in King County, Washington, challenge the constitutionality of the method by which the governing council of the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (“Metro”) is selected. Metro is the entity in charge of water pollution abatement and public transportation throughout the county. The defendants are Metro and its current chairperson. Both sides have moved for summary judgment. All briefs, affidavits, and other materials filed by the parties, the amicus curiae brief of the Attorney General of the State of Washington, and the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Lane v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Polk County Board of Supervisors v. Polk Commonwealth Charter CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Jeffrey Butts v. Philip GunnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. Postema v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Seattle Times Co. v. Leathercare, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
  5. Jackson v. Nassau County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API