Legal Opinion

Howard v. Holm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1940No. 32,733PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In our opinion of October 14, 1940, we did not take notice of the legislative history of L. 1939, c. 345, Part 6, c. 2, § 1, 3 Mason Minn. St. 1940 Supp. § 601-6(2), in the light of which the questions involved should receive different treatment, but with the same result. Our attention was called to the omission before the opinion was published. To correct the omission and to save unnecessary printing, we therefore withdraw the opinion and supersede it by this amended opinion nunc pro tune as of the date of the original.

Relator seeks to compel the secretary of. state to accept his filing by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Fitzgerald v. . VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. In Re the Representation VacancySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1887
  3. State ex rel. Windom v. PrinceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Allen v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range PlanningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API