Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. Reagle

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided June 18, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00187Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION TIMOTHY MARCUS MAYBERRY, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:24-CV-187-HAB-SLC JOHNSON, RON NEAL, and DAVID LIEBEL, Defendants. AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER1 Timothy Marcus Mayberry, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint, raising claims concerning his ability to practice his religion while in the custody of the Indiana Department of Correction (“IDOC”). ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API