Legal Opinion · Dissent

Security Leasing Company v. FLINCO, INCORPORATED

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1969No. 11627Published

1DissentCallister, Justice

The majority opinion is premised on the assumption that the written agreement did not cover an essential aspect of the transaction, namely, the matter of programming of the Computyper for Flinco’s business. The majority, therefore, concluded that the trial court properly found that there was no integrated written document that contained all the agreements of the parties and ad*246mitted oral evidence to determine what was the arrangement between them.

I cannot agree with this analysis and believe it is a covert attempt to contradict, add, or vary the terms of the written agreement.

Plaintiff leased…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rainford v. RyttingUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Abba v. SmythUtah Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API