Legal Opinion

Royal Feaster v. Thomas Miksch, Terry Livers, Joseph Barclay, Phillip Barnes, and City of Akron

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1988No. 87-3777PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants, police officers of the city of Akron, appeal the refusal by the District Court to grant them summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity in this section 1983 action. Alternatively, they assert that the District Court should have abstained from proceeding in this case pending the outcome of state criminal proceedings against Royal Feaster, the plaintiff in this case.

The decision of whether to abstain and the question of whether these defendants are entitled to qualified immunity are, as the parties have recognized, closely interconnected. Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Robert Simpson v. Tim RowanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Brindley v. McCullenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Gordon R. Schilling v. Edward L. White and Robert L. MassieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. Morris B. Myers v. Regnal W. Garff, Jr., David L. Wilkinson, and Michael F. SkolnickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Alexander v. MargolisDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API