Legal Opinion

Mello v. Hamilton Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 14, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought by the insured on an insurance policy issued to her by the defendant, to recover for damages to her automobile resulting from an alleged theft of it by her brother, then fifteen years old. In the policy the defendant agreed to pay to her all loss or damage to her automobile “caused by theft, larceny, robbery or pilferage”.

At a trial in the superior court, the jury, in accordance with a direction to them by the trial justice, returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $400. The case is now before us on a bill of exceptions by the defendant in which the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Firemans Fund Ins. Co. of San Francisco v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Edgewater Nat'l Bank v. Safeguard Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. W. H. Elliott & Sons Co. v. E. & F. King & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1956
  4. Foremost Insurance Company v. PitoccoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. Foremost Insurance Company v. Pitocco, 96-6460 (1999)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API