State v. Fedorov
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶1 This case involves private consultation with counsel in the context of CrR 3.1, the rule-based right to counsel. Roman Fedorov was arrested for attempting to elude law enforcement and driving under the influence. He was transported to the Fife City Jail for the purpose of administering a breath alcohol concentration (BAC) test. Fedorov asked for, and was granted, the opportunity to speak with an on-call defense attorney by telephone before consenting to take the BAC test, pursuant to CrR 3.1. The Washington State Patrol (WSP) trooper, however, remained in the one-room Fife jail, citing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. CoryWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. HollandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. Peña FuentesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. StaeheliWashington Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Nathaniel Allen BristolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State of Iowa v. Matthew Robert SewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- State of Iowa v. Matthew Robert SewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021