Reardon v. Averbuck
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before-, J., Sumter,-. Action by Geo. W. Reardon against Nathan Averbuck. Defendant appeals. cites: Amendment should have been allowed: Code of Proc. 194; 81 S. C. 574. Definition of discretion: 47 S. C. 498. Contract to repair may be separate from lease: 79 S. C. 459; 61 S. C. 166; 65 S. C. 134; 72 S. C. 362, 410. cites: Landlord not bound to repair in absence of contract: 32 S. C. 589. The form of the verdict sufficiently complies with the statute: 10 S. C. 493; 68 S. C.…
Read the full summary
Before-, J., Sumter,-. Action by Geo. W. Reardon against Nathan Averbuck. Defendant appeals. cites: Amendment should have been allowed: Code of Proc. 194; 81 S. C. 574. Definition of discretion: 47 S. C. 498. Contract to repair may be separate from lease: 79 S. C. 459; 61 S. C. 166; 65 S. C. 134; 72 S. C. 362, 410. cites: Landlord not bound to repair in absence of contract: 32 S. C. 589. The form of the verdict sufficiently complies with the statute: 10 S. C. 493; 68 S. C. 98; 75 S. C. 229.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Woods.
In this appeal, in an action of claim and delivery, from a judgment against the defendant, the exceptions assign errors in these particulars: First, in refusing to allow an amendment to the answer; second, in excluding testimony tending to show that the plaintiff had agreed to repair the store for the rent of which the mortgage was given; third, in charging that the plaintiff had demanded possession of the property; and fourth, in refusing a new trial on the ground that the verdict was not in proper form.
1 The foundation of the action…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. SalmondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Bossard v. VaughnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Rouse, Hempstone & Co. v. SarrattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Phoenix Furniture Co. v. JaudonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- Powers Constr. Co., Inc. v. Salem Carpets, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Piedmont Aviation, Inc. v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988