Legal Opinion
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,965 Kimberly Roth Garland Roth Brad Roth v. G.D. Searle & Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 11, 1994No. 93-1282PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Kimberly, Garland, and Brad Roth brought suit against G.D. Searle & Company seeking recovery for injuries suffered as a result of Kimberly Roth’s use of a Cu-7 intrauterine device (IUD). The district court1 granted summary judgment in favor of Searle, concluding that the statute of limitations barred the Roths’ claims, which they filed in March 1989. The court stated Ms. Roth knew of her injuries and either knew or should have known of her potential claims before March 1987 — thereby triggering the two-year limitations period. The Roths argue that there…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Woodsmith Publishing Co. v. Meredith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Nancy E. CLARKE, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Chrischilles v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Forriss D. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Southeast Missouri Hospital v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Lumsden v. Design Tech Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- In Re Prempro Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Ranney v. Parawax Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.