Legal Opinion

Clinton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 3, 1912No. 1487PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of being drunk in a public place. The court charged the jury, as a matter of law, that the grand jury room was a public place. The statute does not so define it. It is a matter of fact to be shown before the jury whether it is or not a public place. Where it is a question of fact and not a matter of law, the court is not authorized or justified in charging the jury as a matter of law that such place is a public place. This court has held that a grand jury room, when the .grand jury is in session, is a public .place. See Murchison v. State, 24…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Elsberry v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Bordeaux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  5. Metzer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Banda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. United States v. Douglas Earl FosslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Warrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Padillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API