Clinton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of being drunk in a public place. The court charged the jury, as a matter of law, that the grand jury room was a public place. The statute does not so define it. It is a matter of fact to be shown before the jury whether it is or not a public place. Where it is a question of fact and not a matter of law, the court is not authorized or justified in charging the jury as a matter of law that such place is a public place. This court has held that a grand jury room, when the .grand jury is in session, is a public .place. See Murchison v. State, 24…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parker v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1862
- Elsberry v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Bordeaux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
- Metzer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Banda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- United States v. Douglas Earl FosslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Warrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Padillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.