Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fudge v. United Urban Indian Council, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1990No. 71407Published

1DissentMeans, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Defendant United Urban Indian Council, Inc., (Tenant) appeals the trial court’s order overruling its motion for new trial in this commercial landlord-tenant dispute. The court awarded judgment for $6,380 to Plaintiffs, Jack D. Fudge and Jo S. Fudge d/b/a Fudge Enterprises (Landlord), on their claim for breach of the lease, and denied Tenant’s counterclaim to recover allegedly overpaid rent. Having reviewed the record and applicable law, I would affirm.

Initially, it should be noted that Tenant has not briefed the first, second, and fifth errors proposed in its petition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pracht v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Steiger v. Commerce Acceptance of Oklahoma City, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Scott v. Signal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Dewberry v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Remy v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API