Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Auchincloss

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 6, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

This is an appeal by the State Tax Commission from the order fixing the transfer tax on the ground that the tax on a remainder was not fixed at the highest possible rate.

The decedent died June 29, 1925, so that the method of taxation is governed by chapter 144 of the Laws of that year, in effect March 16, 1925, amending section 230 of the Tax Law.

*308The decedent gave a life estate in the residuary estate of $135,661.04 to her brother William Stuart Auchincloss. The principal of the fund, less trustees’ commissions, has been taxed against the executors for the benefit of a person of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of SeligmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of SeligmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. In re the Estate of HechtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HeilbrunnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  2. In re the Estate of PayneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
  3. In re the Estate of SchinasiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API