State ex rel. McGhee v. John

I concur in the majority opinion insofar as it restates the crux of the decisions referred to as McGhee 1 and 2.1 I depart in some degree from the majority’s version of the facts in this case and, certainly, from their interpretation of the law.

It is doubtful there will ever be a conclusion to this case satisfactory to the parties on either side. Therefore, it becomes necessary to abide by the judgments of the courts, regardless of the parties displeasure with the results. There must be a conclusion to this matter.

In the first instance, in August 1987 Ms. McGhee was reinstated to her…