Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Flatbush Medical Group & Ittelson
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJacob J. Schwartzwald, J.
In a special proceeding plaintiff moves to stay an arbitration proceeding, or in the alternative, to limit the scope of such arbitration. The named defendant, hereinafter referred to as the respondent, heretofore served a demand upon the plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, for arbitration of his claim for (1) damages for breach of a partnership agreement, (2) a determination of his status as a partner and (3) for an accounting as such partner.
The partnership agreement governed the relationship of the physicians who comprised the membership of the petitioner, a unit operating…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Alsens American Portland Cement Works v. Degnon Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Klein Coat Corp. v. PeretzNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- In re the Arbitration between Aqua Mfg. Co. & H. Warshow & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between Flatbush Medical Group & IttelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962