Legal Opinion

Cox v. Grubb

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Bourbon District Court. The material facts appear in the opinion. Judgment for plaintiff, Grubb, at the December term, 1888. The defendant, Cox, brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

The material facts are, that Cox and Ernst were partners, doing a small butcher business in the town of Eulton, in Bourbon county. January 6, 1888, Ernst died intestate, leaving a widow and some minor children. At the death of Ernst the partnership owed no debts, and had on hand tools and stock of the value of several hundred dollars. Individually Ernst was indebted to several creditors, and owed Grubb about $207, and the only means of payment was the intestate’s interest in the partnership property. Shortly after the death of Ernst, an attempt was made to settle up the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Specht v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ravenscraft v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Estate of AckenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Ballinger v. James F. Redhead & Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
  3. Moffett v. MoffettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Sternberg v. LarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  5. Carleton Mining & Power Co. v. West Virginia Northern RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API