Greene v. Comm'r of Corr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.
**3In this appeal, we must decide whether the habeas court erred in denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner, Mashawn Greene.1 The two primary issues are whether the habeas court properly determined that the petitioner's due process rights were not violated during the underlying criminal trial when the prosecutor failed: (1) to correct certain allegedly false testimony from one *855of the state's key witnesses, Markeyse Kelly,2 and (2) to disclose certain evidence favorable to the petitioner. The third **4issue, which arose during the habeas trial, is whether the…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marquez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Gomez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- State v. Samuel U.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2023
- Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.