Moe v. Reliance Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The complaint contains two causes of action, one alleging facts appropriate for equitable relief, and the other setting forth facts appropriate to an action at law. Demand is made for both equitable and legal relief. Plaintiff had the right to set forth these two causes of action in the same complaint as they arose out of the same transaction. (Code Civ. Proc. § 484.) By bringing such an action, however, plaintiff waived his right to a jury trial. (Cogswell v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 105 N. Y. 319; Carroll v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cogswell v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Baylis v. Bullock Electric Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by5 opinions
- R. J. Marshall, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Hirsch v. FlickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Riesenberger v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Baldwin v. A. B. Leach & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Jaffe v. Reliance InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958