Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 9, 1930No. 286PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The appellants first challenge the constitutionality of section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (26 USCA § 1069), and secondly assert that, even if it be constitutional, their liability is only for a pro rata share of the corporation’s unpaid taxes.

Before passing to a consideration of these primary contentions, it is necessary to dispose of a jurisdictional question, although not urged by the appellee. That question is whether a “transferee” is given the same right of judicial review of the Board’s decision as is a “taxpayer.” The statute provides for review…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Bartlett v. . DrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Williams v. Commercial National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Jaffee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. United States v. CruikshankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  4. United States v. TillinghastDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1932
  5. Liberman's Committee v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API