Phillips v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The appellants first challenge the constitutionality of section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (26 USCA § 1069), and secondly assert that, even if it be constitutional, their liability is only for a pro rata share of the corporation’s unpaid taxes.
Before passing to a consideration of these primary contentions, it is necessary to dispose of a jurisdictional question, although not urged by the appellee. That question is whether a “transferee” is given the same right of judicial review of the Board’s decision as is a “taxpayer.” The statute provides for review…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Bartlett v. . DrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Williams v. Commercial National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Jaffee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States v. CruikshankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- United States v. TillinghastDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1932
- Liberman's Committee v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.