Legal Opinion

Hambrick v. Jackson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 10, 1976No. X-357PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The only point on appeal that merits discussion is appellants’ contention that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury as to the defense of assumption of risk. Our sister court has held that the doctrine of assumption of risk is a valid defense. Dorta v. Blackburn, 302 So.2d 450 (Fla.App. 3rd, 1974). This court held to the contrary in Parker v. Maule Industries, Inc., 321 So.2d 106 (Fla.App. 1st, 1975), and, of course, we are bound by our own precedent.

This case was argued on November 18, 1975. We delayed disposition with the expectation that the Florida Supreme Court would…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dorta v. BlackburnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Parker v. Maule Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blackburn v. DortaSupreme Court of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API