Legal Opinion

Flanders v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 1958No. 37198PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle, Judge.

1. While, ordinarily, “if the criminality of an act depends upon the place where it is committed, the allegation of place is material” (Johnson v. State, 1 Ga. App. 195 (2), 58 S. E. 265), and, while under the law as it stood prior to the 1953 act, it was essential that an accusation or an indictment charging one with the offense of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicants should allege the place where the offense occurred, that is, whether upon a public street or highway, or upon any private street or private property of the State (Isenhower v. State, 88…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Studstill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  2. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Wingard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  5. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Mattarochia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Farley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API