State v. Howell
Washington Supreme Court
Application filed in the supreme court, February 5, 1917, for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to strike from the records the name of a corporation and cancel the license issued thereto.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
— The relator, Progressive Motion Picture Company, a domestic corporation, seeks in this court a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to strike from the records of his office the name of the “Progressive Motion Picture Company,” a California corporation, and cancel the license of that corporation authorizing it to do business in this state.
On September 23, 1916, Gerard Ryzek and J. E. Doughty, residents of Pasco, in this state, duly executed articles of incorporation looking to the organization of relator under the laws of this state. On September 25, 1916, they filed in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- General Film Co. v. General Film Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State ex rel. Baker River & Shuiksan Railroad v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Blackwell's Durham Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Hainque v. Cyclops Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Diamond Drill Contracting Co. v. International Diamond Drill Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Rixford v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Progressive Motion Picture Co. v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Cohen v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.