Legal Opinion

Village of New Richmond v. Painter, Unpublished Decision (7-21-2003)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 2003No. CA2002-10-080Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Village of New Richmond ("Village"), appeals a Clermont County Court of Common Pleas decision finding that defendant-appellee, David Painter's, mobile/manufactured home was a lawful pre-existing nonconforming use of his property. We affirm the decision of the trial court.

{¶ 2} The Village of New Richmond passed a zoning code in 1975 that did not permit mobile or manufactured homes on the property upon which appellee's mobile/manufactured home ("home") is located. This property is located at 503 Washington Street, New Richmond, Ohio. However, the home has been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. SuggsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Board of Trustees v. KriemerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. City of Bowling Green v. SarverOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Bell v. Rocky River Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API