Legal Opinion

Danville Building Ass'n v. Pickering

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided October 5, 1923No. 17061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZHENRY, District Judge.

This is an action at law to recover of the defendant Pickering, as collector of internal revenue, stamp taxes paid under protest. Plaintiff is a building and loan association, operating under the Illinois Building, Roan and Homestead Act (Hurd’s Rev. St. 1921, c. 32, § 78), which makes loans to members or shareholders. When a loan is made, the member is required to assign his certificate of shares to the association as. collateral security for the amount of the loan, to execute an instrument called a “contract,” and to convey by mortgage to tfie association the real…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Malley v. BowditchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
  3. Rondot v. Rogers Tp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  4. Courand v. VollmerTexas Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Home Title Ins. Co. of New York v. KeithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Mutual Bldg. & Sav. Ass'n v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API