Legal Opinion

Borror v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1964No. 3386PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Following an automobile accident a complaint was filed by Kissinger against Borror and Yost. They answered and Borror filed a third-party complaint against The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. The third-party complaint was severed from the main complaint which went to trial, resulting in a judgment for Kissinger against Borror and Yost for $5,000. On appeal we affirmed the judgment on August 1, 1961.1 For eighteen months thereafter no steps were taken to prosecute the third-party complaint, and the third-party defendant, on February 20, 1963, moved for dismissal for failure…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. HinmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Borror v. KissingerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API