Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Miller Peanut Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 8, 1948No. 32072PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Under the doctrine of respondeat superior as applied in this State, every person is liable for the torts of his servant committed in the prosecution and within the scope of his business, whether the same is by negligence or voluntary. See Code, § 105-108. In the case at bar the question which arises, upon the sustaining of a general demurrer, is whether the facts alleged in the petition, when construed most strongly against the pleader, show as a matter of law that at the time of the accident Hufstettler was acting within the scope of his employment. No…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Stenger v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Elrod v. Anchor Duck MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. McClure Ten Cent Co. v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O. B. Hinson, Mrs. O. B. Hinson and Danny Hinson, a Minor, by and Through O. B. Hinson, as Next Friend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Jones v. Aldrich Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Farzaneh v. MERIT CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Bailey v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Johnson v. FranklinDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API