Legal Opinion

Entzel v. Moritz Sport and Marine

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2014No. 20130157PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Laura Jean Entzel appeals a district court opinion awarding her a partial refund of her prepaid rental fee and a district court order denying her request for attorney fees. We reverse the district court judgment’s award of a refund to Entzel, because we hold the force majeure clause of the parties’ contract relieved Moritz Sport and Marine (“Moritz”) of liability for nonperformance and allocated the risk of loss to Entzel. We affirm the district court judgment’s denial of Entzel’s request for attorney fees, concluding Ent-zel was not a prevailing plaintiff in this case.

I

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Silbernagel v. SilbernagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sanders v. Gravel Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Langer v. BartholomayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Thompson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. PHI Financial Services, Inc. v. Johnston Law Office, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Pennington v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Roseana E.D. Palmer v. Mariana Stones Corporation, and Does 1 through 10Supreme Court of Guam · 2021
  4. Funke v. Aggregate Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Bearce v. Yellowstone Energy DevelopmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API