Horman v. Clark
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before ORME, GARFF and DAVIDSON, JJ. GARFF, Judge:
Plaintiffs/appellants S.M. Horman (Hor-man) and S.M. Horman, Jr. (Horman, Jr.) brought suit against defendant/respondent S. Spence Clark to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. The lower court ruled that the Hormans had no cause of action, dismissing the suit. We affirm.
Horman owned a vacant tract of land north of and contiguous to the Valley Shopping Center, owned by Clark, in Murray, Utah. Clark had purchased the shopping center from Horman in 1970. Horman and Clark entered into an agreement which provided, in part, that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gregerson v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- First National Bank v. Jack Mathis General Contractor, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Huntington City v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Garrison v. BlakeneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Garrison v. BlakeneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Salt Lake County v. Metro West Ready Mix, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Larson v. Overland Thrift and LoanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Johnson v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.