Legal Opinion

Horman v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 27, 1987No. 860068-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before ORME, GARFF and DAVIDSON, JJ. GARFF, Judge:

Plaintiffs/appellants S.M. Horman (Hor-man) and S.M. Horman, Jr. (Horman, Jr.) brought suit against defendant/respondent S. Spence Clark to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. The lower court ruled that the Hormans had no cause of action, dismissing the suit. We affirm.

Horman owned a vacant tract of land north of and contiguous to the Valley Shopping Center, owned by Clark, in Murray, Utah. Clark had purchased the shopping center from Horman in 1970. Horman and Clark entered into an agreement which provided, in part, that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gregerson v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. First National Bank v. Jack Mathis General Contractor, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Huntington City v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Garrison v. BlakeneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Garrison v. BlakeneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Salt Lake County v. Metro West Ready Mix, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Larson v. Overland Thrift and LoanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. Johnson v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API