Stone and Radford v. State

Appellants were charged with the commission of a robbery under Ind. Anno. Stat. § 10-4101 (1956 Repl.). Pursuant to a jury verdict, they were convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for ten to twenty-five years. The only error assigned is the overruling of appellants’ motions for a new trial, and the motions for a new trial were based on two contentions;

“(1) That the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and(2) That the verdict of the jury is contrary to law.”

The appellants’ assignment of error in context of their motions for a new trial present only a question of the…