Legal Opinion
United States v. Demosthene
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 20, 2004No. 03 CR. 1409(VM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
By Decision and Order dated June 3, 2004 (the “Order”), the Court granted the Government’s various motions in limine to admit certain evidence at the upcoming trial of defendant Jean Demosthene (“De-mosthene”). Demosthene has been charged in a two-count superceding indictment with possession of more than 500 grams of cocaine with intent to distribute, and with conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. The Order also denied Demosthene’s motions in li-mine to exclude certain evidence. See United States v. Demosthene, No. 03…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re Health Management Systems, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Borja, Jr.Superior Court of Guam · 2012
- People v. FejerangSuperior Court of Guam · 2014
- People v. ValentinoSuperior Court of Guam · 2012
- People v. ValintinoSuperior Court of Guam · 2012