Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 2003No. COA02-1552PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Under State v. Camp, 299 N.C. 524, 528, 263 S.E.2d 592, 594-95 (1980), to revoke a defendant’s probation after the period of probation has expired, the trial court must find “that the State had ‘made reasonable effort... to conduct the hearing earlier.’ ” (citing N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(f)) 1 . In this case, although defendant’s probation period ended on 17 May 2002, the trial court conducted a hearing on 19 August 2002 — after the expiration of defendant’s period of probation and suspension. Because the record shows that the trial court did not make any findings (nor is there…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. State v. PennellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API