Legal Opinion

S. C. Herbst Importing Co. v. Burnham

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Milwaukee County. Replevin. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 12,1892:

OetoN, J.

On September 17, 1889, the summons and writ of attachment in the case of Edward Kalman against Joseph Gressing were personally served on Gressing, the defendant, and on the 19th day of September following, the goods in the saloon of Gressing, and the furniture and fixtures thereof, were seized under the attachment by the defendant, as sheriff of the county of Milwaukee, as the property of Gressing. Before any inventory of the property could be made, it was taken from the possession of the defendant as such sheriff by the writ of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lowe v. StringhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Kaehler v. DobberpuhlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Eureka Steam Heating Co. v. SlotemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. First National Bank v. GeeenwoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Lanyon v. WoodwardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Robert L. Reisinger & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Husting v. DietzenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API