Legal Opinion

Glickfeld v. Venokur

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 25, 1937Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff was the assignee of the vendor under a conditional sale contract whereby certain machinery was sold to Mayfair Dress Company, Incorporated. Plaintiff sued in replevin, setting up her title under the conditional sale contract, and was awarded judgment of possession by the judge of the District Court sitting without a jury.

The defendant, who had bought at foreclosure sale under a subsequent chattel mortgage, appeals and sets up, first, that the plaintiff took nothing by her assignment and, second, that if the plaintiff seeks enforcement of lien her claim rests upon subrogation and is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portley v. Hudson and Manhattan R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Breitbart v. LurichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  3. Portley v. Hudson and Manhattan R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API