Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. City of Melbourne

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 27, 1985No. 83-1809PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

473 So.2d 226 (1985)

Conrad A. SPAULDING, and Betty Spaulding, His Wife, Appellants,

v.

CITY OF MELBOURNE, Etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 83-1809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 27, 1985.

Rehearing Denied July 31 and August 1, 1985.

Catherine A. Riley, of Blumenthal, Schwartz & Riley, P.A., Titusville, for appellants.

William L. Mims, Jr., of Sanders, McEwan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for appellee, City of Melbourne.

Mitchell J. Frank, of Rogers, Dowling and Bos, Orlando, for appellees, Southern Bell Telephone and G.H. Skipper, Inc.

ORFINGER, Judge.

The plaintiffs appeal from an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. DortaSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. O'CONNELL v. Walt Disney World CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Pittman v. Volusia CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Kuehner v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. Coudry v. City of TitusvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Krol v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Levy v. Home Depot, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Gorin v. City of St. AugustineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Hogan v. ChupkaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Ej Strickland v. Dept. of Agr.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API