Legal Opinion

In Re Rittenhouse Carpet, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1985No. 19-11305PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge:

The predominant issue in the case before us is whether 11 U.S.C. § 365(e) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) prohibits the operation of state laws providing that the mere filing of a petition under the Code causes the immediate removal of a debt- or/partner from a partnership. On the basis of § 365(e) and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, we conclude that removal of a debtor/partner may not be predicated merely on the filing of a petition in bankruptcy, notwithstanding provisions of state law to the contrary.

We summarize the facts of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Richmond Leasing Co. v. Capital Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. CP Yorketown, Inc. v. Fidelity America Mortgage Co. (In Re Fidelity America Mortgage Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Cardinal Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  2. Cardinal Industries, Inc. v. Buckeye Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
  3. In Re Corky Foods Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1988
  4. Milford Power Co. v. PDC Milford Power, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2004
  5. Samson v. Prokopf (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API