Hyundai Motor America v. O'NEILL
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKaplan, Justice
This mandamus proceeding presents important issues concerning the steps necessary to preserve a claim of privilege during discovery. I write separately to address these issues.
NECESSITY OF AN APPROPRIATE REQUEST
This discovery dispute centers on the interpretation of Request No. 17 to Plaintiff’s First Request for Production. As originally written, Corina McDonald asked Hyundai to produce:
Each document containing any compilation, report, summary, analysis, index or digest of warranty claims, problems, or complaints pertaining, directly or indirectly, to the seat belt system on the model of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Weisel Enterprises, Inc. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- McKinney v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Gutierrez v. Dallas Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Town East Ford Sales, Inc. v. Gray, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.