Legal Opinion

In Defense of Animals v. United States Department of the Interior

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2011No. 10-16715PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM Opinion; Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON.

OPINION

2Per curiam

This interlocutory appeal arises from an action instituted in the district court to stop the government from rounding up, destroying, and auctioning off wild horses and burros in the Twin Peaks Herd Management Area on the California-Nevada border. Plaintiffs allege that the government’s actions will violate the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act (“Wild Horses Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq., and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.

Plaintiffs are two non-profit organizations dedicated to protecting…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Horse Protection Ass'n v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Donna Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Defense of Animals v. U.S. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Leigh v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Akina v. HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Doug Smith v. Anne HelzerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. Harms v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon (In Re Harms)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API