Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Wittler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an action of ejectment. The defence is the statute of limitations of twenty-four years. Rev. Stats., sect. 3222. The reply is, that in the year 1838, the mother of the plaintiffs was the owner of the land in fee simple, having inhei’ited it from her father; that she was, at the time, the wife of Abner W. Dyer, their father; that there was issue born alive of the marriage in 1837 ; that their marital relation continued until 1869, when it was dissolved by the death of the mother; that the father died a year later; that the plaintiffs are the only surviving issue of the marriage, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dyer v. BrannockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Valle v. ObenhauseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Barrett v. Allegheny National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dyer v. WittlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Ault v. EllerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API