Legal Opinion

Valley Products, Inc. v. Kubelsky

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1937No. Civil No. 3790PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of M. B. Kubelsky, hereinafter called plaintiff, against Western Cotton Products Company, a corporation, hereinafter called garnishee, and Valley Products, Inc., a corporation, hereinafter called intervenor. The facts necessary for a determination of the appeal may be stated as follows.

On January 29, 1931, Roy Pansier executed his promissory note in favor of plaintiff, in the amount of $800, due October 31st the same year. The note not having been paid, a suit was brought thereafter against Pansier on May 9, 1934, in the superior court of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Imperial Valley Land Co. v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Consolidated Land & Irrigation Co. v. HawleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sims v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Riddle v. DowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KeltonArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Chantler v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. ABCDW LLC v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Carley v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API