Valley Products, Inc. v. Kubelsky
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of M. B. Kubelsky, hereinafter called plaintiff, against Western Cotton Products Company, a corporation, hereinafter called garnishee, and Valley Products, Inc., a corporation, hereinafter called intervenor. The facts necessary for a determination of the appeal may be stated as follows.
On January 29, 1931, Roy Pansier executed his promissory note in favor of plaintiff, in the amount of $800, due October 31st the same year. The note not having been paid, a suit was brought thereafter against Pansier on May 9, 1934, in the superior court of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Imperial Valley Land Co. v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Consolidated Land & Irrigation Co. v. HawleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Sims v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Riddle v. DowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KeltonArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Chantler v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- ABCDW LLC v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Carley v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.